twilight2000-digest Saturday, 22 June 1996 Volume 1996 : Number 013 The following topics are covered in this digest: 1. Armour 21 2. Future Game Directions ---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Lee Hutchinson <100737.1412@CompuServe.COM> Date: 21 Jun 96 15:49:40 EDT Subject: Armour 21 I Wrote: > Do you have any idea if Tantalus have any plans for Armour 21, > as GDW never got to release it? Loren Wiseman Wrote: >Armor 21 belongs to David Nilsen, the Designer. He plans to try to compolete >it and get it on the market somehow. Do you know if it is being designed as a stand alone game system using GDW house rules, or as a supplement for T:2K? If you know any details I would be grateful if you could fill me in. Thanks Lee Hutchinson ------------------------------ From: Rob Miracle Date: Fri, 21 Jun 1996 17:03:50 -0400 Subject: Future Game Directions Ok, the list may still be small, and I may not be the right person to actually ask the question that I am about to ask. Please don't read any offical meaning into this question. It is purly my curiosity and a want to get a little conversation going :-) I last played TW2K when it was V1.0. I have a copy of 2.2 laying around, so I am trying to familiarize my self with the current state of the game. Q1. Are there any serious deficencies in the rules that need to be addressed? Q2. What direction would you like to see the game go in with regards to plot line? Obviously WW-III can't last forever and with 2300AD just around the corner . . . Q3. Were there any gaping holes in the TW2K product line like no Naval supplements etc.? I think thats enough for now! Thanks Rob - -- Rob Miracle Tantalus Inc. Be patient or be a patient. -- Anton Devious ------------------------------ End of twilight2000-digest V1996 #13 ************************************